Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Higher Education vs. The Typical Student

There I was jammed packed sitting in my fifteen by fifteen foot fraternity room with my three roommates. All with matching Ralph Lauren pony’s stitched over our hearts sporting designer jeans, debating the all too recurrent decision between work and play. I openly despise the person who decided Thursday night is college night. Did he not have class on Friday or just not care? Feeling the pressure of the frat rat’s and the careless scene that entails almost surpasses the constant demands of school. Picking academics over the bar tableau is incredibly difficult considering college attendee’s are supposed to attend college for educational purposes first and foremost. Why is it so hard? Higher education intuitions receive a lot of criticism concerning their ability to truly educate but whose fault is it really? Yes, the educational arrangement has its flaws but should not be the center of attention. Student’s heedless disposition towards knowledge undermines the core values of today’s educational system.

It starts with the all important decision, how to pick the right college, it may be a two year community college or a four year university. Most colleges offer an array of majors but some may be more intensive in the arts than politics or the sciences than film. Oklahoma State University has a prestigious veterinary branch while New York has a renowned broadcasting department, academic fortes must be considered. Financial obligations with constantly rising tuition, one of the most common topics at my dinner table, may be a concern while scholarship availability and grant money can help offset costs. I happened to guess relatively accurate on the ACT but not all students blow the subjective tests (ACT, SAT, ETC.) out of the water which may help limit the field. Weather patterns and location may rule out extreme climates. Eighty degree snow would be perfect for me but seeing that that is impossible cuts off anything North of Kansas. But are these components the only ones receiving attention? Not a chance.

West Virginia gets bonus points for coming in number one on the 2008 Princeton’s Review’s Top Party School right? A loyal fanatic may be coaxed by a great athletic department or a fantastic Greek system might entice a particular crowd. I found friends and a solid social foundation a necessity. No one wants to embark on this transitional period alone. From the other end of the spectrum, athletes who exploit college as a spring board towards the professional stage have a completely different list of credentials, academics usually residing somewhere towards the bottom. I chose Oklahoma State for a couple of reasons: their Cross Country team, their social reputation, my peers, and of course their solid academic core. Scholarly qualifications, sadly, only play a partial role in the crucial furthering of higher education.

I am a huge advocate of the Greek society as it promotes and teaches life long lessons but lets be honest, grades are not number one on everybody’s to do list. Although most houses require some type of study assembly or schedule, it isn’t always taken seriously. Rush, the process of recruitment that Greek houses exhaust, is very similar to the college method. We appeal to the parents through our Christian Values and numerous academic awards but approach the students a little different. Every house presents their best attributes as to make them look the best rounded on the outside, whether it be shows, athletics, volunteer work, friendship, anything you can think of. But every signee or future prospect wants to know who throws the best parties, who gets the prettiest girls, whose reputation they can count on the most. Again, speaking about the majority. Our best recruitment tool is the word of mouth from other girls. Shallow as it sounds the prettier the better. Once you’re inside the system, yes you reap tremendous benefits but G.P.A. is not one of them. Universities may benefit in a plethora of areas but not in the case of education. Go to your local video search engine and type in sorority girls or frat boys; let me know how many academic related subject lines you can find in between the cleavage and beer-amids. This thought process bleeds over into everyday academic life infringing on the intendment of college’s. But no fingers are directed towards us. How does higher education catch the flack or beheld responsible for Greek Life, just another example of student’s views towards colleges aren’t exactly academically sound.

The collegiate level is structured for students who are willing to learn and put forth the appropriate effort. Most incoming freshmen are between the ages of seventeen and nineteen who have been required to attend class for the last twelve years of their life. But attendance is no longer mandatory and discernment has become voluntary. Sure some teachers take attendance but classes with three hundred plus students don't realy have that option. I go because it's why I'm here not because I have to. I wake up every morning between 8 a.m. and 9 a.m., get dressed and watch my roommates carelessly sleep through their classes. This is a common trend inside our frat house. No longer is there a predecessor to decipher my every step, I am now a novice creating my own. We all make mistakes but choosing to learn from them is where students differ. I have taken more than one unnecessary class that has only stolen from my bank account and extended my stay here at college. But I bet I don't make the mistake again. Through trials and tribulations, students who are dedicated to their education are going to learn, maybe some more than others but it is solely up to the us, the student body, to will ourselves towards learning.

Students who refuse to try are not going to learn, no matter how good the system. Mentors can only do so much for their apprentice’s before it is up to the students to decide how to handle it. Dean Smith, a retired basketball coach for North Carolina and among the winningest coaches in history with over 850 wins, is deemed one of the greatest of all time. But Coach Smith never hit a game winning shot, or led the league in scoring. He never out rebounded his opponents or hit free throw shots. However, he taught his players everything he knew about the game and put them in positions to win. They responded by taking his teachings and performing them on another level. The same approach applies in college. Professors and Doctors put students in a stance to better themselves, to take the information provided and run with it. I will receive back as much from higher education as I put forth into the system.Meaning the contingency to learn presents itself on a daily basis and is susceptible to anyone willing to assert themselves. Most of my professors use the rule of thumb for every one hour in class means two hours of studying out of class. While time consuming and tedious, the benefits are endless. It's not a hidden notion just one students don't desire. Quantum Physics may not be the easiest topic offered but may seem nearly impossible to the foe who does not exert any zeal. Certainly some majors are more challenging than others and some may assimilate more readily but this is concerning the majority.

The problem does not lie within the structural walls or its foundation but rests upon today’s students and their outlook on education. The majority of my peers immerse themselves in a torpid attitude cheating themselves of the full avail of higher education. Procrastination has turned into more of a competition rather than a downfall. Who can accomplish the most in the shortest amount of time? Social events surpass studying and kegs outweigh books. I live in a fraternity house amidst the constant struggle between studying or carousing. Of course I would rather stow away my academic responsibilities in replacement with social festivities but that’s not why I am here. White trash bashes and foam pits are much more appealing than Biochemistry or Molecular biology, sorry. Muddled laughter beats hours buried in a book. I did not develop this demeanor over night. It flourished young and took on a snowball effect with age. You hear about all the fun recruiting trips athletes take: the parties, the girls, the atmosphere, not once do you hear them acclaim how state of the art the library is or the cutting edge research taking place. Priorities must be set in accordance to your best necessities, not your most pleasurable ambitions. I chose to attend college not because four more years of all nighters sounded appealing but because it’s what everybody does. It’s a stepping stone in the right direction toward my end goal.

There is a fine line between distinguishing between priorities and being able to practice these distinguishes. I consider myself one of the rarities, I know what I’d rather do but I know what I need to do. Lackluster proclivities are contagious and the number one inhibitor of learning not the institute itself. We need quit pointing the finger at everybody else and take the blame for our lack of desire. The internal make up of institutions does not accommodate this type of predilection. The format of today’s educational system is designed to present the curriculum to the student. To allot the student as much practice as needed and then test the student for application. Higher education is intended to flood the student with as much information as retainable, not to provide as little information as possible. The objective of a college is to prepare and mold a student into a well rounded functioning member of society, not an apathetic, unrefined, shortcutting body of nothingness.

When education presents itself, students are inattentive and careless. No one can make them want to learn besides themselves. College is a self help program and until we grasp this concept nothing will change. I guess minimum wage and McDonald's doesn't seem so bad after all. Vo-tech and cosmetology school do not seem to be having any problems, so for all the agnostic and doubters of the world there is your riposte.

Sunday, February 17, 2008

A Rough Draft of The Rough Draft.

Michael MacKelvie

Professor Jill Talbot

English/ Comp II

19 February 2008

Students vs. Education


As technology progresses and higher education institutions evolve, student’s childhoods are becoming more and more geared towards school. Parents want their children to be the first to walk, first to talk, and first to read. Children are being placed into scholastic systems earlier than ever. There is now a “pre-pre school” and at the more advance levels a plethora of preparatory schools trying to compel their students to “get ahead.” But is this really benefiting the children’s education or dampening their out look on education? The educational arrangement has its flaws but should not be the center of attention. Student’s heedless disposition towards knowledge undermines the core values of today’s educational system.


It starts with the all important decision, how to pick the right college, it may be a two year community college or a four year university. Most colleges offer an array of majors but some may be more intensive in the arts than politics or the sciences than film. Oklahoma State University has a prestigious veterinary branch while New York has a reowned broadcasting department, academic fortes must be considered. Financial obligations with constantly rising tuition may be a concern while scholarship availability and grant money can help offset costs. Not all students blow the subjective tests (ACT, SAT) out of the water which may help limit the field. Weather patterns and location may rule out extreme climates. But are the components the only ones recieving attention?



West Virginia gets bonus points for coming in number one on the Princeton’s Review’s Top Party School right? A loyal fanatic may be coaxed by a great athletic department or a fantastic Greek system might entice a particular crowd. Friends and a solid social foundation is a necessity as well. No one wants to embark on this transitional period alone. From the other end of the spectrum, athletes exploit college as a spring board towards the professional stage have a completely different list of credentials, academics usually residing somewhere towards the bottom. Scholarly qualifications , sadly, only play a partial role in the crucial furthering of higher education.


Pre-k through 12th grade is structured for students who are willing to learn and put forth an effort and even more so at the collegiate level. Most incoming freshmen are between the ages of 17 and 19 who have been required to attend class for the last 12 years of their life. Attendance is no longer mandatory and discernment is voluntary. No longer is there a predecessor to decipher every step but a novice trying to create his/her own path. Students who refuse to try are not going to learn no matter how good the system. Mentors can only do so much for their apprentice’s before it is up to the students to decide what to do with it. Dean Smith, a retired basketball coach for North Carolina and among the winningest coaches in history with over 850 wins, is deemed one of the greatest of all time. But Coach Smith never hit a game winning shot, or led the league in scoring. He never out rebounded his opponents or hit free throw shots. However, he taught his players everything he knew about the game and they responded by taking his teachings and performing on another level. Students will receive as much from higher education as they put into the system. Meaning the contingency to learn presents itself on a daily basis and is susceptible to anyone willing to assert themselves. Quantum Physics may not be the easiest topic offered but may seem nearly impossible to the foe who does not exert any zeal.


The problem with today’s students is their outlook on education. The majority of my peers immerse themselves in a torpid attitude cheating themselves (of) the full avail of higher education. Procrastination has turned into more of a competition rather than a downfall. Who can accomplish the most in the shortest amount of time? Social events surpass studying and kegs outweigh books. Students do not develop this demeanor over night. It flourishes young and takes on a snowball effect with age. Lackluster proclivities are contagious and the number one inhibitor of learning. The internal make up of institutions does not accommodate this type of predilection. Higher education is intended to flood the student with as much information as retainable, not to provide as little information as possible. The objective of a college is to prepare and mold a student into a well rounded functioning member of society, not an apathetic, unrefined, shortcutting body of nothingness.
(((Technology has hurt us just as much or more as it has helped us. Rather than stimulating ones mind through reading or writing we let technology do it for us. We have developed a handicap in which we use other people’s imagination or ideas as a crutch, another ingredient responsible for student’s lethargic attitudes towards learning.))) I'm not quite sure if should add this or if i do to expand cause I kind of just threw it in there.


The format of today’s educational system is designed to present the curriculum to the student. To allot the student as much practice as needed and then test the student for application. But today’s teens lackadaisical attitude inhibits the systems ability to educate. Motivation plays a big role in how teenagers view public education. Students who are capable of motivating themselves thrive in this type of system. I consider myself as being able to self-motivate. An online course is a great example of people who are able to stay ahead and keep their goals in mind. There is no teacher holding our hand and the responsibility is placed completely on the student body’s shoulders. The curriculum has been laid out; we have been allotted more than enough practice and now it is up to the student on how far he/she wants too take it. Along with motivation, the art of prioritizing is as important for a student to be successful. I find myself in situations all the time when I am forced to pick between work and play. Students are who able to conquer the right mind set towards education are the ones who experience the greatest success. These are the teachers, lawyers, and doctors of today’s world; the ones who took advantage of education instead of “doing as little to get by”.


(((Weak ending, any ideas throw them my way)))

Education has no limitations and should be treated likewise. When the circumstance presents itself students perspectives are inattentive and careless. For today’s educational system to work students have to be dedicated and disciplined. Education is on the same side as the student, there should be no internal war between the two.

No Women For Me!

I think I am going to change my prompt, nothing against you women, I just can't get motivated to write about how much you girls rule.

New Life:
Our educational system- but I am going to take a different approach, instead of attacking the high schools or universities I am going to focus more on the students.
- Sure our universities have some flaws but it shouldn't be our main focus
- Lack of motivation in the students
- The real reasons why and how we pick what college to go to
- Students outlook on education
- What you put in, you get out.

Any other extradorinary ideas would be greatly appreciated!

Sunday, February 10, 2008

Essay II Prompt

Womens Role In Todays Day and Age
-Womens role 100 years ago
-Women In The Army
-Women in Politics
-Maybe discuss stay at home dads are more popular now
-Now Certain Jobs aren't just geared towards women or men
-Difference in feminist and fanatic
-Women sports, I don't know maybe not.